Authors
Sangeeta Sharna-Wagner, et al., Journal of Occupational and Environmental
Medicine 2000; 42(5):517-525.
Occupation and
prostate cancer risk in Sweden
This is a hypothesis-generating
study reporting prostate cancer risk for various occupational and industrial
categories in Sweden. Prior to this study, excess prostate cancer risks
had been reported among various occupations. To provide new leads regarding
occupational prostate cancer risk, the authors utilized the Swedish
Cancer-Environment Registry, which links information on current employment
at the time of the 1960 National Census with cancer incidence data from
the National Swedish Cancer Registry for the period 1961 to 1979. A
total of 36,269 men employed in 1960 developed microscopically confirmed
prostate cancer and were used in this analysis. Consistent with previous
studies, excess risks of prostate cancer were found among the agriculture,
tobacco, sales, clerical, and mechanical industries. New findings include
the excess risks observed in the industries of pig iron and steel foundries,
soap and perfume manufacture, butchers and meat processors, lime and
chalk production, pulp grinding and cellulose manufacture, leather tanning,
veterinary medicine, forest management workers, and breeders of fur-bearing
animals. In addition, small decreased risks of prostate cancer were
observed in several occupations and industries that had been reported
previously to have increased risks of prostate cancer, including coal
miners, rubber workers, mining and quarry workers, and construction
metal workers.
A variety of potential carcinogens, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons,
metal dust, and cutting fluids may be related to the excess risk found
among pig iron workers. Exposures to carcinogenic reagents, solvents,
and other chemicals, including aromatic and halogenated hydrocarbons,
asbestos, diethyl-sulfate, benzyl-chloride, cadmium, trichloroethylene,
and perchloroethylene may be associated with the elevated risk observed
in soap and perfume workers. Butchers and meat processors had a 13%
excess risk of prostate cancer. Exposure to animal steroid hormones
and possibly an increased dietary consumption of meat and animal fat
have been proposed to explain the risk in this group. Suspected carcinogens
and bleaching agents may be related to the excess risk observed for
pulp grinders and cellulose workers. Possible carcinogenic exposures
among lime and chalk workers include asbestos fiber dust, bitumen fumes,
and wollastonite. Noteworthy are the excess risks seen for leather workers,
veterinarians, forest management workers, and breeders of fur-bearing
animals since these classes of workers may have some exposures in common
with farmers, including chemicals, herbicides, insecticides, hormones,
and zoonotic viruses. Farmers and other agricultural workers have elevated
prostate cancer risks that may be related to exposure of multiple suspected
carcinogens, including pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers,
solvents, fuels and oils, dust, zoonotic viruses, microbes, fungi, and
animal hormones.
Information regarding socioeconomic status, smoking, diet, physical
activity, and other lifestyle factors were not provided by the Swedish
Cancer-Environment Registry. In addition, specific measurements of contaminant
exposure were not performed in this study; possible exposures are inferred
from occupation and industry. Furthermore, information on the duration
of employment was not available. However, occupational change is uncommon
in Sweden and thus the occupational category reported in the 1960 national
census is likely to represent an individual's usual adult job classification.
This study suggests that occupation is unlikely to play a major role
in prostate cancer etiology because the observed excess risks were usually
quite small (<10%). Nonetheless, future studies are needed to identify
specific exposures related to the observed excess risk among farmers
and other occupations and industries.