Authors:
Brody JG., Aschengrau A., McKelvey W., Rudel RA., Swartz CH., Kennedy
T
Title:
Breast cancer risk and historical exposure to pesticides from wide-area
applications assessed with GIS
Source:
Environmental Health Perspectives 112(8):889-897, 2004.
Summary:
Concerns regarding breast cancer incidence on Cape Cod have previously
been cited. Breast cancer incidence rates have been found to be greater
on Cape Cod than in the state as a whole, with risk increasing with
length of residence on the Cape. Pesticides are considered to be endocrine
active compounds, and associations between exposure to these chemicals
and breast cancer have been speculated. Previous research has documented
the wide use of pesticides to support tourism, cranberry cultivation
and other agriculture on the Cape. This study investigated the association
between breast cancer and residential proximity to large-scale pesticide
use on Cape Cod.
A population-based
case-control study of 1,165 cases of invasive breast cancer and 1,016
controls was conducted. Cases who were diagnosed between 1988 and 1995
on the Massachusetts Cancer Registry and who resided for at least 6
months on Cape Cod during this time were selected. Of 1,578 eligible
cases 74% agreed to participate in the study. Controls were matched
to cases by ten year age group and vital status. Of 1,503 eligible controls,
a 68% participation rate was achieved. Exposures were determined by
reconstructing wide-scale historical pesticide applications dating back
to 1948 using GIS (geographic information system) technology. Factors
to account for pesticide drift and deposition were incorporated into
models in order to estimate exposure at each subject's place of residence.
Differentiation was made between whether the pesticide was considered
to be persistent or non-persistent and the purpose for which the pesticide
was used (e.g. cranberry bogs, tree pests, other agriculture or mosquito
control). For exposures where the type of pesticide was unknown, applications
between 1948 and 1974 were considered to be more persistent and applications
after 1975 less persistent. Additional potential risk factors (i.e.
family history of breast cancer, menstrual and reproductive history,
height, weight, physical activity, education, pharmaceutical hormone
use, alcohol and tobacco use) were identified by conducting interviews
with both the cases and controls.
No overall pattern
of association between pesticide use and breast cancer was found.
More cases than controls reported a family history of breast cancer
(as was expected). Cases were also more likely to be over the age of
30 at the time of their first birth. Cases and controls were similar
with respect to education, but comparability on other factors such as
hormone replacement therapy, oral contraceptive use, diethylstilbestrol
exposure, home pesticide use etc. was not reported.
There are several
methodological limitations which should be considered in the interpretation
of the results of this study. One major limitation in the selection
of cases and controls was that a minimum length of residence on Cape
Cod of only 6 months was required. This is important because length
of residence is an indication of duration of exposure. Amount of time
living on the Cape ranged from 6 months to 47 years with a median residence
time of 16 and 15 years for cases and controls respectively. Thus the
study only accounts for a small proportion of lifetime exposure history
for participants with only a short residence time on the Cape. Generally,
there is a lack of information about exposures during the years when
the women lived away from Cape Cod. Also exposures incorporated into
the GIS models were limited to those recorded for specific applications.
It is quite probable that other non-recorded exposures occurred. Therefore
the actual exposures of each woman may vary quite substantially from
the exposures estimated by the models; this increases the likelihood
that the study will not find any significant effects. In addition, women
with a personal history of breast cancer were not excluded from the
study. This is a significant limitation as the etiology for a recurrent
breast cancer diagnosis is different than that of a primary diagnosis.
Overall, this study
reported no association between breast cancer incidence in Cape Cod
and wide-scale pesticide exposure. Although a number of limitations
were observed, the application of GIS technology and mathematical models
to account for the fate of pesticides in the environment is an important
methodological development which may be widely used in the future for
studies of this type.